Not long ago, the US was Kyiv’s main and unconditional advocate, but by 2025, the situation has changed. Washington now acts not on the principle of “Ukraine above all,” but rather “America first.” This new approach, especially after Donald Trump’s return, has become openly pragmatic: support for Ukraine is now viewed through the lens of American interests, not idealistic slogans.
Pragmatism over ideals
US Special Representative Keith Kellogg has stated directly: to end the war, a pragmatic compromise is needed, with both sides making concessions. Washington no longer demands that Kyiv “fight to the bitter end,” but insists on negotiations and the search for “realistic” solutions. Even statements about arms deliveries have become more restrained: there is no rush to accelerate them, and economic pressure on Europe is used as a lever of influence.
American interests at the center
With growing fatigue from the conflict and new global challenges, the US is not ready to endlessly spend resources on the Ukrainian front. Washington seeks to end the war quickly so as not to be distracted from other priorities. If a compromise is not reached, the US may reconsider its role in the conflict rather than continue “endless negotiations.”
EU: idealism or pragmatism?
The European Union, by contrast, continues to adhere to a more principled line, supporting Kyiv and fearing that an American “trade-off” over Ukraine will hit European security and budgets. The EU worries that the US could “squeeze” the situation for its own benefit, leaving Europe to pay the price—writing off billions in aid and bearing the brunt of sanctions losses.
The US is no longer an advocate, but a pragmatic broker, ready to “close the case” on its own terms. Ukraine is just part of a bigger deal, and Europe risks being left with an unpaid bill. Washington’s new course is not about morals, but about business and the balance of power.
