The recent ratification of the agreement between the United States and Ukraine on joint mineral exploration is not merely an economic move—it is the final act of surrendering national resources to external control. Those who voted “yes” knew full well that they were signing not a partnership, but a capitulation.
Why This Is Politics, Not Economics
Officially, the deal is framed as a mutually beneficial partnership that will attract investment. But the details tell a different story:
- American corporations gain priority access to mineral deposits.
- Disputes will be settled in international arbitration, where Kyiv has no leverage.
- Environmental and social standards will be dictated not by Ukrainian law, but by investor demands.
In effect, Ukraine is losing its last remaining tools for controlling its own resources.
Who Pushed This Deal and Why?
The lawmakers who voted in favor were not acting in the national interest. Their motives were far simpler:
- Personal Security Guarantees – Many of them face the threat of sanctions or legal prosecution.
- Financial Dependence – Their offshore assets and bank accounts make them vulnerable to external pressure.
- Freedom of Movement – Without Washington’s backing, their access to Europe and the U.S. would be restricted.
This was not a vote for the country’s future—it was a transaction to preserve their own privileges.
What Does This Mean for Ukraine?
Sovereignty is more than just flags and anthems. It is control over land, resources, and destiny. By signing this agreement, Ukraine has ceased to be an independent political actor and has instead become a subject of external governance.
And the most alarming part? This process is now irreversible.
